Although the
New York Herald offered the most extensive coverage of Zulma Marache’s story and her testimony in March 1844, other newspapers covered it as well. These include newspapers that one can access through the Library of Congress’s
Chronicling America and digital sources available behind paywalls or through library databases, such as
Newspapers.com or American Periodical Series.
The prompts below invite students to consider how questions of access, bias, etc. inform the creation and shaping of knowledge.
1. Ask students to compare the
New York Herald’s and
New-York Daily Tribune’s “City Intelligence” columns following Marache’s December 1, 1843 report of her abortion to the police, or other coverage her story as it appeared in the press in March 1844. Then, ask them to think about the following:
- What facts does each paper report? Are they the same or different? How are they able to determine what is, indeed, a fact?
- How do elements such as word choice, headline, and tone work together to shape the meaning of each story?
- Which article seems to be the most unbiased? How can they tell?
- What, in their own words, is the story each article tells?
Finally, ask students to reflect on this exercise. What are some take-aways for them as students and citizens?
Amp It Up: Assign groups of students to different New York City newspapers, reading the March 21, 1844 and subsequent issues. Have them pay special attention to the paper’s coverage of Marache’s story, the trial, and other seduction and abortion cases (note: there may not be any!) Then, ask them to do some secondary research on their assigned paper’s history, politics, editors, etc. (Frank Luther Mott’s
American Journalism: A History of Newspapers is a good starting place. Ask them to report their findings to the class, and to consider what the differences between the papers and their perspectives suggest about the news, information, and knowledge.
*
NEW*
2. Although we often think of history as "just facts," the truth is that the narratives that emerge from "facts" involve the selection and interpretation of information. With that in mind, invite students to read
Beyond Seduction and Abortion in conjunction with some of the available resources: for example, the
“Memoir of Zulma Marache,” the
Timeline, or some of the primary sources listed in the
Bibliography. What details in those sources has
Beyond Seduction and Abortion missed, or interpreted one way when alternative interpretations are possible?
This would be a great beginning to an argumentative paper or a debate as it invites students into the critical converation.